Design principles for human-wildlife coexistence
This project aims to define, survey and derive principles for human-wildlife coexistence. It works through (a) literature review, and survey of conservation practitioners and (b) fieldwork to identify and inductively derive principles of coexistence from where it exists in the world in particular places. Methodologies include surveys of literature and key informants, workshops and focus groups, and fieldwork including animal behaviour studies and ethnographic work at sites where coexistence occurs. As human-wildlife conflict and coexistence are now part of the GBF Target 4 aspirations, and indicators are required for monitoring these by all signatories to the CBD, clarity on coexistence and how to monitor it would have impact. The first supervisor is on the steering committee of the IUCN Specialist Group on Human-Wildlife Conflict and Coexistence, which published Guidelines on Human-Wildlife Conflict and Coexistence (2023), and and its policy working group is tasked with developing an indicator for Target 4 for human-wildlife interactions.
conservation ecology - external partner
basics of ethology / animal behaviour - supervisory team
ethnographic methods and ethics - supervisory team
social science / qualitative data - supervisory team
Conservation studies are increasingly being incorporated into academic departments including geography, biology, and more general environmental studies programs.
Conservation biology as a field - NGOs, government departments etc. - increasingly require staff who can work across natural sciences / social sciences silos, are aware of the ethics involved, and are comfortable working with quantitative and qualitative data.
Working with IoZ and NGOs will connect a student with key conservation organisations active in the field.